DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Sang-Jun Kim | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2024-08-20T16:33:13Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2024-08-20T16:33:13Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2024 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 2288-8063 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | https://oak.kribb.re.kr/handle/201005/35642 | - |
dc.description.abstract | While generative artificial intelligence (AI) technology has become increasingly competitive since OpenAI introduced ChatGPT, its widespread use poses significant ethical challenges in research. Excessive reliance on tools like ChatGPT may intensify ethical concerns in scholarly articles. Therefore, this article aims to provide a comprehensive narrative review of the ethical issues associated with using AI in academic writing and to inform researchers of current trends. Our methodology involved a detailed examination of literature on ChatGPT and related research trends. We conducted searches in major databases to identify additional relevant articles and cited literature, from which we collected and analyzed papers. We identified major issues from the literature, categorized into problems faced by authors using nonacademic AI platforms in writing and challenges related to the detection and acceptance of AI-generated content by reviewers and editors. We explored eight specific ethical problems highlighted by authors and reviewers and conducted a thorough review of five key topics in research ethics. Given that nonacademic AI platforms like ChatGPT often do not disclose their training data sources, there is a substantial risk of unattributed content and plagiarism. Therefore, researchers must verify the accuracy and authenticity of AI-generated content before incorporating it into their article, ensuring adherence to principles of research integrity and ethics, including avoidance of fabrication, falsification, and plagiarism. | - |
dc.publisher | Korea Soc-Assoc-Inst | - |
dc.title | Research ethics and issues regarding the use of ChatGPT-like artificial intelligence platforms by authors and reviewers: a narrative review | - |
dc.title.alternative | Research ethics and issues regarding the use of ChatGPT-like artificial intelligence platforms by authors and reviewers: a narrative review | - |
dc.type | Article | - |
dc.citation.title | Science Editing | - |
dc.citation.number | 2 | - |
dc.citation.endPage | 106 | - |
dc.citation.startPage | 96 | - |
dc.citation.volume | 11 | - |
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor | Sang-Jun Kim | - |
dc.contributor.alternativeName | 김상준 | - |
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitation | Science Editing, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 96-106 | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.6087/kcse.343 | - |
dc.subject.keyword | Artificial intelligence | - |
dc.subject.keyword | Authorship | - |
dc.subject.keyword | Peer review | - |
dc.subject.keyword | Publishing | - |
dc.subject.keyword | Research ethics | - |
dc.subject.local | Artificial intelligence | - |
dc.subject.local | artificial intelligence | - |
dc.subject.local | artificial intelliegence | - |
dc.subject.local | Artificial Intelligence | - |
dc.subject.local | Publishing | - |
dc.description.journalClass | N | - |
There are no files associated with this item.
Items in OpenAccess@KRIBB are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.