Evaluation of the efficacy and cross-protectivity of recent human and swine vaccines against the pandemic (H1N1) 2009 virus infection = 신종 플루 백신의 효능 연구

Cited 36 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

Full metadata record

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorP N Q Pascua-
dc.contributor.authorM S Song-
dc.contributor.authorJ H Lee-
dc.contributor.authorK J Park-
dc.contributor.authorH I Kwon-
dc.contributor.authorY H Baek-
dc.contributor.authorS P Hong-
dc.contributor.authorJ B Rho-
dc.contributor.authorC J Kim-
dc.contributor.authorHaryoung Poo-
dc.contributor.authorT S Ryoo-
dc.contributor.authorM H Sung-
dc.contributor.authorY K Choi-
dc.date.accessioned2017-04-19T09:18:29Z-
dc.date.available2017-04-19T09:18:29Z-
dc.date.issued2009-
dc.identifier.issn1932-6203-
dc.identifier.uri10.1371/journal.pone.0008431ko
dc.identifier.urihttps://oak.kribb.re.kr/handle/201005/9508-
dc.description.abstractThe current pandemic (H1N1) 2009 virus remains transmissible among humans worldwide with cases of reverse zoonosis, providing opportunities to produce more pathogenic variants which could pose greater human health concerns. To investigate whether recent seasonal human or swine H1N1 vaccines could induce cross-reactive immune responses against infection with the pandemic (H1N1) 2009 virus, mice, ferrets or mini-pigs were administered with various regimens (once or twice) and antigen content (1.77, 3.5 or 7.5 mg HA) of a-Brsibane/59/07, a-CAN01/04 or RgCA/04/09xPR8 vaccine. Receipt of a-CAN01/04 (2-doses) but not a-Brisbane/59/07 induced detectable but modest (20-40 units) cross-reactive serum antibody against CA/04/09 by hemagglutinin inhibition (HI) assays in mice. Only double administration (7.5 mg HA) of both vaccine in ferrets could elicit cross-reactivity (30-60 HI titers). Similar antigen content of a-CAN01/04 in mini-pigs also caused a modest,30 HI titers (twice vaccinated). However, vaccine-induced antibody titers could not suppress active virus replication in the lungs (mice) or virus shedding (ferrets and pigs) of immunized hosts intranasally challenged with CA/04/09. Furthermore, neither ferrets nor swine could abrogate aerosol transmission of the virus into naive contact animals. Altogether, these results suggest that neither recent human nor animal H1N1 vaccine could provide complete protectivity in all animal models. Thus, this study warrants the need for strain-specific vaccines that could yield the optimal protection desired for humans and/or animals.-
dc.publisherPublic Library of Science-
dc.titleEvaluation of the efficacy and cross-protectivity of recent human and swine vaccines against the pandemic (H1N1) 2009 virus infection = 신종 플루 백신의 효능 연구-
dc.title.alternativeEvaluation of the efficacy and cross-protectivity of recent human and swine vaccines against the pandemic (H1N1) 2009 virus infection-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.citation.titlePLoS One-
dc.citation.number12-
dc.citation.endPagee8431-
dc.citation.startPagee8431-
dc.citation.volume4-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorHaryoung Poo-
dc.contributor.alternativeNamePascua-
dc.contributor.alternativeName송민석-
dc.contributor.alternativeName이준한-
dc.contributor.alternativeName박국진-
dc.contributor.alternativeName권혁일-
dc.contributor.alternativeName백윤희-
dc.contributor.alternativeName홍승표-
dc.contributor.alternativeName노종복-
dc.contributor.alternativeName김철중-
dc.contributor.alternativeName부하령-
dc.contributor.alternativeNameRyoo-
dc.contributor.alternativeName성문희-
dc.contributor.alternativeName최영기-
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationPLoS One, vol. 4, no. 12, pp. e8431-e8431-
dc.identifier.doi10.1371/journal.pone.0008431-
dc.description.journalClassY-
Appears in Collections:
Division of Research on National Challenges > Infectious Disease Research Center > 1. Journal Articles
Files in This Item:

Items in OpenAccess@KRIBB are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.