Whitefly infestation on pepper plants elicits defence responses against bacterial pathogens in leaves and roots and changes the below-ground microflora

Cited 125 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

Full metadata record

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorJung Wook Yang-
dc.contributor.authorHwe-Su Yi-
dc.contributor.authorH K Kim-
dc.contributor.authorBoyoung Lee-
dc.contributor.authorSoo-Hyun Lee-
dc.contributor.authorS Y Ghim-
dc.contributor.authorChoong-Min Ryu-
dc.date.accessioned2017-04-19T09:20:57Z-
dc.date.available2017-04-19T09:20:57Z-
dc.date.issued2011-
dc.identifier.issn0022-0477-
dc.identifier.uri10.1111/j.1365-2745.2010.01756.xko
dc.identifier.urihttps://oak.kribb.re.kr/handle/201005/9894-
dc.description.abstractUpon facing biotic stresses, plants orchestrate defence mechanisms via internal and external mechanisms that are mediated by signalling molecules such as salicylic acid, jasmonic acid, ethylene and various other volatile compounds. Although pathogen- and chemical-induced plant resistance has been studied extensively within the same plant compartment, the effects of above-ground (AG) insect-elicited plant defence on the resistance expression in roots and the below-ground (BG) microbial community are not well understood. We assessed the effect of AG whitefly (Bemisia tabaci) attack on the elicitation of induced resistance against a leaf pathogen, Xanthomonas axonopodis pv. vesicatoria, a soil-borne pathogen, Ralstonia solanacearum, and on BG modifications of the rhizosphere microflora in peppers (Capsicum annuum). Symptom development caused by the two bacterial pathogens on leaves and roots was significantly reduced in whitefly-exposed plants as compared to controls. A combined treatment with benzothiadiazole (BTH) and whitefly caused an additive effect on induced resistance, indicating that whitefly-induced plant defence can utilize salicylic acid (SA)-dependent signalling. To obtain further genetic evidence of this phenomenon, we evaluated the gene expression of Capsicum annuum pathogenesis-related protein (CaPR) 1, CaPR4, CaPR10 and Ca protease inhibitor II, and observed increased expression after BTH and/or whitefly treatment indicating that AG whitefly infestation elicited SA and jasmonic acid signalling in AG and BG. Since the expression pattern of PR genes in the roots differed, we assessed microbial diversity in plants treated with BTH and/or whitefly. In addition to eliciting BG defence responses, a whitefly infestation of the leaves augmented the population of root-associated Gram-positive bacteria and fungi, which may have positively affected plant growth and induced systemic resistance. Whitefly feeding reduced plant size, which usually occurs as a consequence of the high costs of direct resistance induction. Synthesis. Our results demonstrate that whitefly-induced resistance against bacterial pathogens can cross the AG-BG border and may cause further indirect benefits on future plant development, because it can positively affect the association or plant roots with putatively beneficial microorganisms.-
dc.publisherWiley-
dc.titleWhitefly infestation on pepper plants elicits defence responses against bacterial pathogens in leaves and roots and changes the below-ground microflora-
dc.title.alternativeWhitefly infestation on pepper plants elicits defence responses against bacterial pathogens in leaves and roots and changes the below-ground microflora-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.citation.titleJournal of Ecology-
dc.citation.number1-
dc.citation.endPage56-
dc.citation.startPage46-
dc.citation.volume99-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorJung Wook Yang-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorHwe-Su Yi-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorBoyoung Lee-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorSoo-Hyun Lee-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorChoong-Min Ryu-
dc.contributor.alternativeName양정욱-
dc.contributor.alternativeName이외수-
dc.contributor.alternativeName김현경-
dc.contributor.alternativeName이보영-
dc.contributor.alternativeName이수현-
dc.contributor.alternativeName김사율-
dc.contributor.alternativeName류충민-
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationJournal of Ecology, vol. 99, no. 1, pp. 46-56-
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/j.1365-2745.2010.01756.x-
dc.subject.keywordAbove-ground-
dc.subject.keywordBelow-ground-
dc.subject.keywordPlant growth-promoting rhizobacteria-
dc.subject.keywordPlant-herbivore interactions-
dc.subject.keywordRalstonia solanacearum-
dc.subject.keywordWhitefly-
dc.subject.keywordXanthomonas axonopodis-
dc.subject.localAbove-ground-
dc.subject.localAboveground-
dc.subject.localBelow-ground-
dc.subject.localplant growthpromoting rhizobacteria-
dc.subject.localPlant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR)-
dc.subject.localPlant growthpromoting rhizobacteria (PGPR)-
dc.subject.localPlant growthpromoting rhizobacteria-
dc.subject.localPlant growth-promoting rhizobacteria-
dc.subject.localPlant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR)-
dc.subject.localPGPR-
dc.subject.localplant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR)-
dc.subject.localplant growth-promoting rhizobacteria-
dc.subject.localPlant-herbivore interactions-
dc.subject.localRalstonia solanacearum-
dc.subject.localWhitefly-
dc.subject.localwhitefly-
dc.subject.localXanthomonas axonopodis-
dc.subject.localxanthomonas axonopodis-
dc.description.journalClassY-
Appears in Collections:
Division of Research on National Challenges > Infectious Disease Research Center > 1. Journal Articles
Files in This Item:
  • There are no files associated with this item.


Items in OpenAccess@KRIBB are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.